On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Yonik. Should submit this as a bug ticket? Currently it's not a deal
> breaker as we're setting fl manually anyway.
Yes, please do.
-Yonik
Thanks Yonik. Should submit this as a bug ticket? Currently it's not a deal
breaker as we're setting fl manually anyway.
Matt
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is probably a document in your index with the field "word".
> The json writers may be less
There is probably a document in your index with the field "word".
The json writers may be less tolerant when encountering a field that
is not known.
We should perhaps change the json/text based writers to handle this
case gracefully also.
-Yonik
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Matt Mitchell <[E
Actually, the dismax thing was a bad example. So, forget about the qt param
for now. I did however, search the schema and didn't find a reference to
"word". The problem comes in when I switch the wt param from xml to json (or
ruby).
q=*:*&wt=xml == success
q=*:*&wt=json == error
q=*:*&wt=ruby == e
Hi Matt,
You need to edit your solrconfig.xml and look for the word "word" in the dismax
section of the config and change it to "spell".
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@luce
