All good info guys. Appreciate the responses.
Some more on the use case: I'm wanting to display the platonic ideal of
sorts for a given set of potential vendor names.
In some cases I can get away w a lookup in our database based on the term
in the document (not its other synonyms) brought back fr
You may find this blog interesting.
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2017/03/streaming-nlp-is-coming-in-solr-66.html
It deals with how the analyzer chain can now be applied in Streaming
Expressions. It will be part of the 6.6 release and is in master and
branch_6x already.
Joel Bernstein
http://joels
On 2017-04-01 10:51 AM, John Blythe wrote:
Hi Rick. I should explain further. I'm not looking to have the input stored
but rather the final product, specifically the synonym that an input may be
mapped to.
If I have McDonald, McD's, and Mac Donald all mapped to "McDonald's" I'd
like to be able t
On 4/1/2017 8:51 AM, John Blythe wrote:
> Hi Rick. I should explain further. I'm not looking to have the input stored
> but rather the final product, specifically the synonym that an input may be
> mapped to.
>
> If I have McDonald, McD's, and Mac Donald all mapped to "McDonald's" I'd
> like to be
On 4/1/2017 8:51 AM, John Blythe wrote:
> Hi Rick. I should explain further. I'm not looking to have the input stored
> but rather the final product, specifically the synonym that an input may be
> mapped to.
>
> If I have McDonald, McD's, and Mac Donald all mapped to "McDonald's" I'd
> like to be
Hi Rick. I should explain further. I'm not looking to have the input stored
but rather the final product, specifically the synonym that an input may be
mapped to.
If I have McDonald, McD's, and Mac Donald all mapped to "McDonald's" I'd
like to be able to not only access which one was sent to solr
stored="true" (the default)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Type+Definitions+and+Properties
On 2017-03-31 01:55 PM, John Blythe wrote:
hey all
i'm wanting to store one of my field's analyzed token for retrieval. is
there any way to do this? the preliminary googling i'd
