se groups based
> on the sum score of every subject.
>
> my pleasure to listen your suggestions.
>
>
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-sort
bject, sort these groups based
on the sum score of every subject.
my pleasure to listen your suggestions.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-sort-groups-by-the-sum-of-the-scores-of-the-documents-within-each-group-tp4134715p4134869.html
Sent from the Solr -
a score of
> .01 and group 2 could have 1 document with a score of 1,000 and group 1
> would sort
> first) ,but the function is required by the client, can you tell me the way
> how to achieve it ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.47206
0 and group 1
would sort
first) ,but the function is required by the client, can you tell me the way
how to achieve it ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-sort-groups-by-the-sum-of-the-scores-of-the-documents-within-each-group-tp4134715p4134856.html
Sent from the
"name": "摩托罗拉i5",
> "type": "电脑",
> "price": 1500,
> "id": "f211525f-bc3c-4ea7-aded-1c46a94ecd1c",
> "_version_": 1466799766311534600
> }
> ]
> thank you , Erick,
> i want to sort groups based on the sum of documents' scores within each
> group, as you said, solr excels at getting the score of single documents, in
> solr 4.6, the default sort of group each other depends on the maxScore of
> all documents within each group, but the sum of documents' scores, though i
> can get the sum of documents' scores by the client program, it's not good
> idea, l know that the stats component of solr can statistics the long field,
> so I had the idea to use statistic data for score field, but the score is
> pse-udo field, the stats.field doesn't support it. In addition, as
> scheme.xml displayed, i do group on the elements of a string field(type)
> without using participle.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-sort-groups-by-the-sum-of-the-scores-of-the-documents-within-each-group-tp4134715p4134830.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
on the maxScore of
all documents within each group, but the sum of documents' scores, though i
can get the sum of documents' scores by the client program, it's not good
idea, l know that the stats component of solr can statistics the long field,
so I had the idea to use statistic data for score field, but the score is
pse-udo field, the stats.field doesn't support it. In addition, as
scheme.xml displayed, i do group on the elements of a string field(type)
without using participle.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Re-sort-groups-by-the-sum-of-the-scores-of-the-documents-within-each-group-tp4134715p4134830.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I don't think so. Solr excels at getting the score of single
documents, not aggregation.
It's not at all clear to me, though, that the sum of documents' scores
is a reasonable thing to sort by. Consider grouping on a very common
term. You'd never do this, but group on the elements of a text field.
