I know that I can see the search result after the commit and it is ok,
I can disable the queryResultCache and the problem will be fixed . but I
need the queryResultCache because my index Size is big and I need good
performance .
so I am trying to find how to fix the bug or may be the solr guys
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Parisa wrote:
>
> I should say that we also have this problem when we commit with waitflush =
> true and waitsearcher = true
>
> because it again close the old searcher and open a new one. so it has
> warming up process with the queryResultCache.
>
> besides , I
I should say that we also have this problem when we commit with waitflush =
true and waitsearcher = true
because it again close the old searcher and open a new one. so it has
warming up process with the queryResultCache.
besides , I need to commit waitFlush = false and waitSearcher=false to
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Parisa wrote:
>
> I found how the issue is created .when solr warm up the new searcher with
> cacheLists , if the queryResultCache is enable the issue is created.
>
> notice:as I mentioned before I commit with waitflush=false and
> waitsearcher=false
>
> so it has
I found how the issue is created .when solr warm up the new searcher with
cacheLists , if the queryResultCache is enable the issue is created.
notice:as I mentioned before I commit with waitflush=false and
waitsearcher=false
so it has problem in case the queryResultCache is on,
but I don't know
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Parisa wrote:
>
> Is there any solution for fixing this bug ?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/solrj-delete-by-Id-problem-tp21433056p21661131.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
I don't think it is
Is there any solution for fixing this bug ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solrj-delete-by-Id-problem-tp21433056p21661131.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> Did you call commit after the delete?
>
> Ofcourse I call commit and I test both commit(false,false) and
> commit(true,true) in both cases the result is the same.
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Parisa wrote:
>
>>
>> I have a problem with solrj delete B
Did you call commit after the delete?
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Parisa wrote:
>
> I have a problem with solrj delete By Id . If I search a keyword and it has
> more than 1 result no (for example 7) then I delete on of the resulted doc
> with solrj (server.deleteById ) , I search this key
