RE: solrj & http client 4

2011-01-17 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Stevo, Thanks for reviewing the Maven POMs in LUCENE-2657 - I appreciate it. > In those poms, not all modules have explicit version and groupId which > is a bad practice. Really? According to the "POM best practices" section in Sonatype's Maven book

Re: solrj & http client 4

2011-01-16 Thread Stevo Slavić
[mailto:ssla...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:17 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: solrj & http client 4 >> >> Tried to checkout lucene/solr and setup projects and classpath in eclipse >> - >> there seems to be c

RE: solrj & http client 4

2010-12-22 Thread Steven A Rowe
iginal Message- > From: Stevo Slavić [mailto:ssla...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:17 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: solrj & http client 4 > > Tried to checkout lucene/solr and setup projects and classpath in eclipse > - > the

Re: solrj & http client 4

2010-12-22 Thread Stevo Slavić
Tried to checkout lucene/solr and setup projects and classpath in eclipse - there seems to be circular dependency between modules - this is not possible/allowed in maven built project, would require refactoring. Regards, Stevo. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote: > OK, thanks. C

Re: solrj & http client 4

2010-12-08 Thread Stevo Slavić
OK, thanks. Can't promise anything, but would love to contribute. First impression on the source code - ant is used as build tool, wish it was maven. If it was maven then https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1218would be trivial or wouldn't exist in the first place. Regards, Stevo. On Wed,

Re: solrj & http client 4

2010-12-08 Thread Chantal Ackermann
SOLR-2020 addresses upgrading to HttpComponents (form HttpClient). I have had no time to work more on it, yet, though. I also don't have that much experience with the new version, so any help is much appreciated. Cheers, Chantal On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 18:35 +0100, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Dec

Re: solrj & http client 4

2010-12-07 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Stevo Slavić wrote: > Hello solr users and developers, > > Are there any plans to upgraded http client dependency in solrj from 3.x to > 4.x? I'd certainly be for moving to 4.x (and I think everyone else would too). The issue is that it's not a drop-in replacement