I think you're missing the importance of Zookeeper here. You need to
upload the config to Zookeeper (as of Solr 5.5 you can do this with
bin/solr zk --upload, before that you have to use zkcli)...
Anyway, the pattern is:
1> create your config directory
2> upload it to Zookeeper.
3> create your col
s was with 4.10.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 3:09 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: solrconfig.xml - configuration scope
What specifically are you seeing? Most things are per-core as you surmised.
There are a
What specifically are you seeing? Most things are per-core as you surmised.
There are a few things which, through interaction with Lucene global
variables affect multiple cores, the one that comes to mind is
maxBooleanClauses, where the value in the last core loaded "wins".
There might be some ot
Hi Pradeep,
AFAIK the mailing list doesn't allow attachments. I think pasting the
error should be enough
Best,
Andrea
On 04/08/2015 09:02 AM, Pradeep wrote:
We have installed solr-4.3.0 is our local but we are getting error.
Please find attachment. And help us to fix this error.
Thank You.
: It's possible that this just a mistake in the error message after some
: "real" error with your actual geo/conf/solrconfig.xml has already been
Confirmed, the error message itself is bad...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5814
-Hoss
http://www.lucidworks.com/
: I have a core "geo" (with an empty file core.properties inside) and
solrconfig.xml at
: /srv/solr/solr4.6.1/cores/geo/conf/solrconfig.xml
...
: But I get the error message:
: "Could not load config file /srv/solr/solr4.6.1/cores/geo/solrconfig.xml"
1) what does your solr.xml file look
File permissions? Malformed XML? Are there any other exceptions
earlier in the log? If you substitute that file with one from example
distribution, does it work?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is th
> Thanks, I'm new to the clustering libraries. I finally made this
> connection when I started browsing through the carrot2 source. I had
> pulled down a smaller MM document collection from our test environment. It
> was not ideal as it was mostly structured, but small. I foolishly thought
> I
be, I just need to dig deeper into their
library. Or I could just be missing something fundamental? :)
-Original Message-
From: "Stanislaw Osinski"
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 5:04am
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solrconfig.xml carrot2 params
Hi,
Out of cu
Hi,
Out of curiosity -- what would you like to achieve by changing
Tokenizer.documentFields?
If you want to have clustering applied to more than one document field, you
can provide a comma-separated list of fields in the carrot.title and/or
carrot.snippet parameters.
Thanks,
Staszek
--
Stanisla
That is what I needed
req.getCore().getResourceLoader().getConfigDir()
Thanx
Bruno
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Andrea Gazzarini <
andrea.gazzar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, if your RequestHandler implements SolrCoreAware you will get a
> SolrCore reference in inform(...) method. In SolrCor
Yes, if your RequestHandler implements SolrCoreAware you will get a
SolrCore reference in inform(...) method. In SolrCore you have all what
you need (specifically SolrResourceLoader is what you need)
Note that if your request handler is a SearchHandler you don't need to
implement that interfa
Le 31 juil. 2012 à 14:07, Roland Ucker a écrit :
> Is it possible to map a request URL to a JSP in the solrconfig.xml?
Roland,
not in the solrconfig.xml but it's not too hard to make a wrapper that can do
that... I have code here that does this (actually forwards the requests to
anything, not j
Yep, that's about it. By far the main constraint is memory and the caches
are what eats it up. So by minimizing the caches on the master (since they
are filled by searching) you speed that part up.
By maximizing the cache settings on the servers, you make them go as fast
as possible.
RamBufferSiz
Is that it? Of all the strange, esoteric, little understood configuration
settings available in solrconfig.xml, the only thing that affects Index
Speed vs Query Speed is turning on/off the Query Cache and RamBufferSize?
And for the latter, why wouldn't RamBufferSize be the same for both...that
is,
> In the Wiki and the book by Smiley and Pugh, and in the
> comments inside the
> solrconfig.xml file itself, it always talks about the
> various settings in
> the context of a blended use solr index. By that I mean, it
> assumes you are
> indexing and querying from the same solr instance. However,
Just an update to say that the only way I figured out to include my 2
tags was via the element() scheme :
* http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
*
obviously this is not desirable and clean at all even if it can make the
trick if the number of fields is very small.
Any ot
Hi,
I am trying to do a similar thing within the schema.xml (using Solr 1.4.1),
having a (super)schema that is common to 2 instances and specific fields I
would like to include (with XInclude).
Something like this:
*
...
...
*
and it works with the sp
Kevin Miller wrote:
I am using the 8/11/09 nightly build of Solr and have a couple of
questions about the ExtractingRequestHandler in the solrconfig.xml file.
1. What is the purpose of 'startup="lazy"' in the requestHandler?
Makes it so the RequestHandler won't be inited until its actually a
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> No error, attached is solrconfig.xml files( one is from 1.2.0 that works
> and the other is 1.3.0 that doesn't work)
>
>
Francis, it seems the attached files were eaten up by the mailing list. Can
you re-send or put them up online somewher
e.org
Subject: Re: Solrconfig.xml
Is there an error in the logs?
On May 6, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> I just upgraded from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 of solr.
> We have an existing data/index that I will be using from 1.2.0 to
> 1.3.0 and I use the default solrconfig.xml that come fr
Is there an error in the logs?
On May 6, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
I just upgraded from 1.2.0 to 1.3.0 of solr.
We have an existing data/index that I will be using from 1.2.0 to
1.3.0 and I use the default solrconfig.xml that come from 1.3.0.
For some reason when I used solrco
Jeff,
Thanks.
It would be nice if you just review the config syntax and see if all
possible usecases are covered . Is there any scope for improvement ?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:45 AM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
> It does appear to be working for us now. The files replicated out
> appropriately which
It does appear to be working for us now. The files replicated out
appropriately which is a huge help. Thanks to all!
-Jeff
On 12/13/08 9:42 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" wrote:
> Jeff, SOLR-821 has a patch now. It'd be nice to get some feedback if
> you
manage to try it out.
On Thu, Dec 11,
Jeff, SOLR-821 has a patch now. It'd be nice to get some feedback if you
manage to try it out.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response. I will keep an eye on that to see how it
> progresses.
>
>
> On 12/10/08 8:03 PM, "Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्"
The moment the current patch is tested it will be checked in.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response. I will keep an eye on that to see how it
> progresses.
>
>
> On 12/10/08 8:03 PM, "Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्"
> wrote:
>
>> This is a known is
Thank you for the quick response. I will keep an eye on that to see how it
progresses.
On 12/10/08 8:03 PM, "Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is a known issue and I was planning to take it up soon.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-821
>
>
> On Thu, Dec
This is a known issue and I was planning to take it up soon.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-821
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Jeff Newburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious as to whether there is a solution to be able to replicate
> solrconfig.xml with the 1.4 replication.
Jeff,
Are you using Solr 1.3 replication scripts? If so, I think it would be pretty
simple to:
1) put all additional files to replicate to slaves to a specific location (or
use a special naming scheme) on the master
2) write another script that uses scp or rsync to look for those additional
f
29 matches
Mail list logo
