I suppose you saw my JIRA suggesting that solr.xml should might have
the same repetoire of 'lib' elements as solrconfig.xml, instead of
just a single 'str'.
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> What's supposed to happen (not guaranteeing it is completely correct,
> mind you)
What's supposed to happen (not guaranteeing it is completely correct,
mind you) is that the presence of a tag defines which checks
are performed. Errors are thrown on old-style constructs when no
tag is present and vice-versa.
Best
Erick
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote
One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Sh
On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
I don't think so, but if you grab the 4.3 branch or branch_4x and find
any bugs, let us know.
Thanks,
Shawn
Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
On May 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style child to
>> configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
>>
>> Caused by: org.apache.solr.
On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style child to
> configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
>
> Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Should not have found
> solr/str[@name='sharedLib'] solr.xml may be a mix of ol
Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style child to
configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Should not have found
solr/str[@name='sharedLib'] solr.xml may be a mix of old and new style
formats.
at org.apache.solr.core.ConfigSo
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
> it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> http://wiki.apache.org
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
>
> does not point to any information on solr.xml.
>
> Given https://issues
