Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-05-11 Thread abhayd
hi jack, It worked with dismax. I was using a our search partner provided wrapper around dismax and it seems like it has a bug. I switched to dismax and all is working fine now. Thanks for help -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread Jack Krupansky
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time hi jack, thanks, i figured out the issue. It was settings during query and index time -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-query-time

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread abhayd
hi jack, thanks, i figured out the issue. It was settings during query and index time -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-query-time-tp3950045p3951811.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread Jack Krupansky
onday, April 30, 2012 11:56 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time hi jack, tried &qs=10 but unfortunately it does not seem to help. Not sure what else could be wrong abhay -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabbl

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread abhayd
hi jack, tried &qs=10 but unfortunately it does not seem to help. Not sure what else could be wrong abhay -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-query-time-tp3950045p3951083.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread abhayd
hi jack, tried &qs=10 but unfortunately it does not seem to help. Not sure what else could be wrong abhay -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-query-time-tp3950045p3951082.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread abhayd
hi jack & erick, Thanks I do have qs set in solrconfig for query handler dismax settings. 10 Still does not work abhay -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-query-time-tp3950045p3951038.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread Jack Krupansky
The &qs=1 request parameter should work for the dismax query parser as well as edismax. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:58 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time See Ja

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread Erick Erickson
See Jack's comments about phrases, all your parsed queries are phrases, and your indexed terms aren't next to each other. Best Erick On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:54 AM, abhayd wrote: > hi Erick, > autoGeneratePhraseQueries="false" is set for field type. And it works fine > for standard query parse

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread abhayd
hi Erick, autoGeneratePhraseQueries="false" is set for field type. And it works fine for standard query parser. Problem seem to be when i start using dismax. As u suggested i checked analysis tool and even after word delimiter is applied i see search term as "blackberry 9801" so i dont think it s

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread Jack Krupansky
When WDF filters blackberry9810 it will treat it as a sequence of tokens but as if it were a phrase, like "blackberry 9810", with the two terms adjacent, at least with the edismax query parser. I'm not sure what the other query parsers do. If you are using edismax, you can set the QS (query sl

Re: solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory query time

2012-04-30 Thread Erick Erickson
Try attaching &debugQuery=on to your query and seeing if that helps you understand what's going on. If that doesn't help, also look at admin/analysis. If all that doesn't help, post your schema definition for the field type and the results of &debugQuery=on (you might look at: http://wiki.apache.or