You can specify a filter query that has "must not" terms. For example:
fq=*:* field1:(-shoot -darn -rats) field2:(-shoot -darn -rats)
or
fq=*:* field1:(-shoot -darn -rats)
fq=*:* field2:(-shoot -darn -rats)
Ypu could specify edismax for the filter query parser and list the fields in
the qf pa
Hi,
Ups, I miswrote, it is omitHeader not omitHeaders
Please see : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#omitHeader
Ahmet
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:37 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Hi Kishan,
Solr response already includes that info in QTime section. Aren't you seeing
it? If you
Hi Kishan,
Solr response already includes that info in QTime section. Aren't you seeing
it? If you don't see it try setting &omitHeaders=false
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:12 PM, Kishan Parmar wrote:
Hello,
how to get milliseconds result function in solr gives result in milliseconds
like
Hi,
Try using facet.query on each part, you will get the number of total hits
for every OR.
If you need this info per document, the answers might appear when
specifying debug query=true.. If that info is useful, try adding
"[explain]" to fl param (probably requires registering the augmenter plugin
Try LucidImagination's KStemmer
-
Thanx:
Grijesh
www.gettinhahead.co.in
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2747106.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is there any other filter which can solved my singular plural problem?
Anurag
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2746956.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:41 AM, anurag.walia wrote:
> it will be polymers but result will come different in case of polymer and
> polymers (singular/plural).
> or there can be more words like polymer.
[...]
Your only alternative then is to implement a filter that works the
way you want it to.
it will be polymers but result will come different in case of polymer and
polymers (singular/plural).
or there can be more words like polymer.
Regards
Anurag Walia
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-result-problem-tp2746849p2746947.html
Sent from the Solr -
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, anurag.walia wrote:
> Hi Gora,
>
> Thanks for relied.
>
> i applied this snowballporterfilterfactory for remove difference of result
> in case of plural or singular.
> if i entered polymer then it working fine but again polymers giving me
> "polym".
> while bag o
Hi Gora,
Thanks for relied.
i applied this snowballporterfilterfactory for remove difference of result
in case of plural or singular.
if i entered polymer then it working fine but again polymers giving me
"polym".
while bag or bags giving me bag after snowballporterfilterfactory .
Please find t
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:46 AM, anurag.walia wrote:
[...]
> I have a problem with number of character in Term Text . I entered
> "Polymer" but after snowballporterfilterfactory it become "Polym" while it
> was not exist in "protwords.txt" file . I want if any word does not exist in
> "protwords.
Hi Lance,
I actually copied tika exceptions in one html file and indexed
it. It is just a content of a file and here i tell u what i mean::
if i post a query like *java* then the result or response from solr should
hit only a part of the content like as follows::
http://localhost:
I'm not quite sure what Tika exceptions mean in this context.
You can give the 'fl=field1,field2' option to only return some fields in
a query.
You can get google-like results using highlighting and 'snippetizing'.
These are documented on the wiki.
satya swaroop wrote:
Hi ,
Can the resu
I have used Solrj with Solr 1.2 and it works fine. Ofcourse you won't be
able to use the newer API methods like rollback.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
> Hi Shalin,
>Yes I am using java.
>I am using solr 1.2 ..As per my knowledge solrJ is not compatible wilt
> solr 1.
Hi Shalin,
Yes I am using java.
I am using solr 1.2 ..As per my knowledge solrJ is not compatible wilt
solr 1.2.
Regards,
Rinesh
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
>>Cur
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Rinesh1 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I wanted some inputs on the solr result xml.
>Currently the result obtained will be of the format
>
>
> attrResult1
> attrResult2
>
>
>Is it possible some how to change it to the form
>
>
>
On Dec 5, 2007 3:06 PM, Owens, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> surely the term offsets are returned when a search is done on a field with
> that data available?
Nope.
That data isn't even stored in the index unless you store termvectors
with that info... and even in that case the info is more
17 matches
Mail list logo