Hi All,
pushing the query to the top.
Does anyone have any idea about it?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ajay Sharma wrote:
> Hi Community,
>
> This is the first time, I am implementing a solr *highlighting *feature.
> I have read the concept via solr documentation
> Link- https://lucene.apa
Thanks David.
So I guess I will have to go with default highlighter (with a higher
fragsize) and then take care of boundryScanning myself.
Ah. Currently the most accurate highlighter is the default one, so if
accuracy is more important than BreakIterator then you’ll have to switch
back. Keep an eye out for some efficiency enhancements to this highlighter
“real soon now”. Separately from that efficiency, later this year I may
have a
Yes. It seems to work for Default Highlighting. I'm using Fast Vector
Highlighter.
Let me also explain why I went for Fast Vector Highlighter. I wanted the
highlighted content to be complete and not broken words and for that I
need to use breakIterator which works only for Fast vector highlightin
John,
I’m not seeing this problem. Presumably we’re talking about the default
highlighter (the most accurate one) but I figure the others would match it
too. To test, I added the following to HighlightTest.java in Solr and this
test passed:
@Test
public void testSpan() {
final String fie
Well, maybe you can work with the ComplexPhraseQueryParser, that's
been around for a while, see:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_10_1/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/ComplexPhraseQueryParser.html
Or you can just live with the inherent slop in the ~ operator. You
haven't rea
I have this line highlighted
Jobs was born in San Francisco, California on February
24 1955.
for query "Jobs born"~15 but not for "born Jobs"~15. I want the same result
irrespective of the order of search keywords.
Regards,
John Eipe
“The Roots of Violence: Wealth without work, Pleasure withou
Well, the syntax is wrong. You probably want content_raw:"jobs
born"~15. The way slop works, it is the number of "moves" so this will
match "jobs was a man born somewhere" and "all persons born include
jobs". The difference is that the version that has "born" first and
"jobs" second will take an ex
Hi Jack,
thank you for the hint.
Best Regards
Erwin
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 4:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline
There are some detailed examples
There are some detailed examples in my e-book as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erwin Gunadi
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline
Hi Furkan,
thanks for the reply.
I was
Message-
From: Furkan KAMACI [mailto:furkankam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Best Practices Guideline
This is a too broad question. If you have specific questions or want to see
other users' problems
This is a too broad question. If you have specific questions or want to see
other users' problems about highlighting feature at Solr you can check
here:
http://search-lucene.com/?q=highlighting&fc_project=Solr&fc_type=mail+_hash_+user
On the other hand you can read Using Additional Solr Functionali
>> I’m having some issues with Solr search results (using Solr 1.4 ) . I
have enabled highlighting of searched text (hl=true) and set the fragment
size as 500 (hl.fragsize=500) in the search query.
Below is the (screen shot) results shown when I searched for the term
‘grandfather’ (2 results are
(12/04/05 15:34), Thomas Werthmüller wrote:
Hi
I configured solr that also word parts are found. When is search "Monday"
or "Mond" the right document is found. This is done with the following
configuration in the schema.xml:.
Now, when I add hl=true to the query sting, the excerpt for "Monday"
(12/02/22 7:53), Nitin Arora wrote:
Hi,
I'm using SOLR and Lucene in my application for search.
I'm facing an issue of highlighting using FastVectorHighlighter not working
when I use PayloadTermQueries as clauses of a BooleanQuery.
After Debugging I found that In DefaultSolrHighlighter.Java,
f
Thank you for request! I'm did next request and all is ok
https://localhost:8443/solr/alfresco/select?wt=standard&q=TYPE:%22{http://www.test.com/test/test/model/content/0.1}field%22&indent=on&hl=true&hl.fl=TYPE
https://localhost:8443/solr/alfresco/select?wt=standard&q=TYPE:%22{http://www.test.com/
(11/11/22 22:30), VladislavLysov wrote:
Hello!!!
I have a trouble with Solr highlighting. I have any document with next
fields- "TYPE", "DBID" and others. When i do next request -
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=TYPE:
https://localhost:8443/solr/myCore/afts?wt=standard&q=
This is really not what I'm looking for. While I could see it accomplishing
the job I'd prefer that the highlighting component take into account the fqs
when doing highlighting. Again I can get around this by simply joining all
the fqs with an AND and making them the query but this is limiting si
Hi,
Vote for this feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1926
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 17. juni 2011, at 21.48, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I've read in several places that the Solr Highlighting com
s.
>
> Searching histo will return : African American History
>
> --- On Tue, 1/11/11, Dan Loewenherz wrote:
>
> > From: Dan Loewenherz
> > Subject: Re: Solr highlighting is botching output
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Tuesday, Januar
Replacing with EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory with
combination should solve your problem. Preserving your search within
words.
Searching histo will return : African American History
--- On Tue, 1/11/11, Dan Loewenherz wrote:
> From: Dan Loewenherz
> Subject: Re: Solr highlighting is bo
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
> Not sure about your solr version but probably it can be
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2266
>
> Is there a special reason for using EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory?
> Replacing this tokenizer with WhiteSpaceTokenizer should solve
Not sure about your solr version but probably it can be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2266
Is there a special reason for using EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory?
Replacing this tokenizer with WhiteSpaceTokenizer should solve this.
Or upgrade solr version.
And I don't see either in your
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > Thats really strange. Can you provide us field type
> > definition of text field. And full search URL that caused
> > that output. And the solr version.
> >
>
> Also, did you enable term vectors on text field?
>
>
Not sure what those are, s
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Thats really strange. Can you provide us field type definition of text
> field. And full search URL that caused that output. And the solr version.
>
Sure. Full search URL:
/solr/select?indent=on
&version=2.2&q=history&fq=&start=0&rows=10&fl
> Thats really strange. Can you provide us field type
> definition of text field. And full search URL that caused
> that output. And the solr version.
>
Also, did you enable term vectors on text field?
> I'm implementing Solr for a course and book search service
> for college
> students, and I'm running into some issues with the
> highlighting plugin.
> After a few minutes of tinkering, searching on Google,
> searching the group
> archives and not finding anything, I thought I would see if
> anyo
(10/09/25 8:07), Jed Glazner wrote:
Hi Koji,
I'm trying to get the FVH to work per your suggestion, but I think I must have
something misconfigured...
Here is the field def in my schema.xml:
Then here is my request handler in solrconfig.xml:
edismax
name_title^3 plain^6 grams^1 sou
Hi Koji,
I'm trying to get the FVH to work per your suggestion, but I think I
must have something misconfigured...
Here is the field def in my schema.xml:
Then here is my request handler in solrconfig.xml:
The same as with other formats. You give it strings to drop in before
and after the highlighted text.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> How does highlighting work with JSON output?
>
> Dennis Gearon
>
> Signature Warning
>
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> oth
How does highlighting work with JSON output?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 9/17/10, Ahson Iqbal wrote:
> From: Ahson Iqbal
> Subject: Solr Hi
Hi Koji
thank you very much it really works
From: Koji Sekiguchi
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Fri, September 17, 2010 7:11:31 PM
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting Issue
(10/09/17 16:36), Ahson Iqbal wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have an issue in hig
(10/09/17 16:36), Ahson Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I have an issue in highlighting that if i query solr on more than one fields
like "+Contents:risk +Form:1" and even i specify the highlighting field is
"Contents" it still highlights risk as well as 1, because it is specified in the
query.. now if i s
(10/09/09 2:26), Jed Glazner wrote:
Thanks for taking time to read through this. I'm using a checkout from
the solr 3.x branch
My problem is with the highlighter and wildcards
I can get the highlighter to work with wild cards just fine, the problem
is that solr is returning the term matched
Anybody?
On 09/08/2010 11:26 AM, Jed Glazner wrote:
Thanks for taking time to read through this. I'm using a checkout from
the solr 3.x branch
My problem is with the highlighter and wildcards
I can get the highlighter to work with wild cards just fine, the problem
is that solr is retur
No problem: wrapping and unwrapping escaped text can be very confusing.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Niraj Aswani wrote:
> Hi Lance,
>
> apologies.. please ignore my previous mail. I'll have a look at the
> PatternReplaceFilter.
>
> Thanks,
> Niraj
>
> Niraj Aswani wrote:
>>
>> Hi Lance,
>>
Hi Lance,
apologies.. please ignore my previous mail. I'll have a look at the
PatternReplaceFilter.
Thanks,
Niraj
Niraj Aswani wrote:
Hi Lance,
Yes, that is once solution but wouldn't it stop people searching for
something like "characters at the index time, one would have to write a quer
Hi Lance,
Yes, that is once solution but wouldn't it stop people searching for
something like "characters at the index time, one would have to write a query like
"
To display html-markup in an html page, it has to be in entity-encoded
form. So, encode the <> as entities in your input application, and
have it indexed and stored in this format. Then, the are
inserted as normal. This gives you the html text displayable in an
html page, with all words highlighta
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Set hl.usePhraseHighlighter parameter to true:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.usePhraseHighlighter
>
>
That seems to have done it. Thanks.
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/paultomblin
Set hl.usePhraseHighlighter parameter to true:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.usePhraseHighlighter
Koji
Paul Tomblin wrote:
If I do a query for a couple of words in quotes, Solr correctly only returns
pages where those words appear exactly within the quotes. But the
hig
Just in case anyone wants to know: I figured out that you have to set uniqueKey
stored="true" for highlighting to work. Thanks for everyone's help.
Thanks,
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Xiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apac
Do you see anything wrong there?
Thanks,
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr highlighting
The minimum "stuff" needed to highlight term X in field F is:
fie
Yes. I did all that. Maybe my custom analyzer conflicts with highlighting.
Thanks for the tips.
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr highlighting
The minimum "
n Vogler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr highlighting
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 09:21:36 Kevin Xiao wrote:
Hi there,
I am new to solr. I want search term to be highlighted on the
results. I
thought it is pretty si
ogler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 5:55 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr highlighting
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 09:21:36 Kevin Xiao wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am new to solr. I want search term to be highlighted on the results. I
> thought it is p
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 09:21:36 Kevin Xiao wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am new to solr. I want search term to be highlighted on the results. I
> thought it is pretty simple, but could not make it work. I read a lot of
> solr documents and mail archives (I wish there is a search function for
> this, w
est Regards, Martin Owens
-Original Message-
From: Binkley, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12/5/2007 4:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Highlighting, word index
We're doing a similar process using term vectors to look up the
bounding-box data in
380. We're looking at using
Lucene's new payload functionality.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 2:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Highlighting, word index
On 5-Dec-07, at 1:02 PM,
On 5-Dec-07, at 1:02 PM, Owens, Martin wrote:
Thanks Mike, So in essence I need to write a new RequestHandler
plugin which takes the query string, tokenises it then perform a
some kind of action against the index to return results which I
should then be able to get the termVectors from?
You do not necessarily need two requests; instead, you can override
or modify the request handler you are using (StandardRequestHandler,
DisMaxREquestHandler) to return the information. You'll have to
process the Query to extract the terms (like HighlighingUtils does),
then get the TermVe
On 3-Dec-07, at 10:58 AM, Owens, Martin wrote:
You can tell lucene to store token offsets using TermVectors
(configurable via schema.xml). Then you can customize the request
handler to return the token offsets (and/or positions) by retrieving
the TVs.
I think that is the best plan of actio
Owens, Martin wrote:
Hello everyone,
We're working to replace the old Linux version of dtSearch with Lucene/Solr,
using the http requests for our perl side and java for the indexing.
The functionality that is causing the most problems is the highlighting since
we're not storing the text in so
> You can tell lucene to store token offsets using TermVectors
> (configurable via schema.xml). Then you can customize the request
> handler to return the token offsets (and/or positions) by retrieving
> the TVs.
I think that is the best plan of action, how do I create a custom request
h
It's good you already have the data because if you somehow got it from
some sort of calculations I'd have to tell my product manager that
the feature he wanted that I told him couldn't be done with our data
was possible after all ...
About page breaks:
Another approach to paging is to index a spe
On 30-Nov-07, at 1:02 PM, Owens, Martin wrote:
Hello everyone,
We're working to replace the old Linux version of dtSearch with
Lucene/Solr, using the http requests for our perl side and java for
the indexing.
The functionality that is causing the most problems is the
highlighting since
> Or I'm just completely off base here.
A little, we already have the locations for each word on every ocr, we just
need the word index to feed into the existing program.
Best Regards, Martin Owens
Oh, good luck on this! I've had similar issues and have just thrown up my
hands. How do you expect to be able to correlate a word in the index
with the bounding box in the OCR? I'm not sure this is a solved problem
unless your OCR is *very* regular and clean. Even if you can calculate
the ordinal p
58 matches
Mail list logo