thx i just need to call solr.commit
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-add-document-tp4224480p4224698.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Please provide details. You might want to review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
You haven't provided
1> the sample doc
2> the schema you're using, at least for the search field
3> the solrconfig.xml file, particularly the default search field
4> the results of adding &debug=query
Alexandre:
It Depends (tm) of course. It all hinges on the setting in ,
whether is true or false.
In the former case, you, well, open a new searcher. In the latter you don't.
I agree, though, this is all tangential to the memory consumption issue since
the RAM buffer will be flushed regardless
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
>> Why do one big commit? You could do hard commits along the way but keep
>> searcher open and not see the changes until the end.
>>
>
> Alexandre,
> I don't think it's can happen in solr-user list, next search pickups the
> new searcher.
W
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> Why do one big commit? You could do hard commits along the way but keep
> searcher open and not see the changes until the end.
>
Alexandre,
I don't think it's can happen in solr-user list, next search pickups the
new searcher.
Ryan,
Why do one big commit? You could do hard commits along the way but keep
searcher open and not see the changes until the end.
Obviously a separate issue from memory consumption discussion, but thought
I'll add it anyway.
Regards,
Alex
On 05/09/2014 3:30 am, "Li, Ryan" wrote:
> HI Shawn,
>
>
Hi Guys,
Just some update.
I've tried with Solr 4.10 (same code for Solr 4.9). And that has the same index
speed as 4.0. The only problem left now is that Solr 4.10 takes more memory
than 4.0 so I'm trying to figure out what is the best number for Java heap size.
I think that proves there is s
n at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5914.
Best,
Erick
From: Li, Ryan
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 3:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr add document over 20 times slower after upgrade from 4.0 to
4.9
HI Shawn,
Thanks for y
HI Shawn,
Thanks for your reply.
The memory setting of my Solr box is
12G physically memory.
4G for java (-Xmx4096m)
The index size is around 4G in Solr 4.9, I think it was over 6G in Solr 4.0.
I do think the RAM size of java is one of the reasons for this slowness. I'm
doing one big commit an
Ryan:
As it happens, there's a discssion on the dev list about this.
If at all possible, could you try a brief experiment? Turn off
all the storage, i.e. set stored="false" on all fields. It's a lot
to ask, but it'd help the discussion.
Or join the discussion at https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
On 9/3/2014 8:14 PM, Li, Ryan wrote:
> I have a Solr server indexes 2500 documents (up to 50MB each, ave 3MB) to
> Solr server. When running on Solr 4.0 I managed to finish index in 3 hours.
>
> However after we upgrade to Solr 4.9, the index need 3 days to finish.
>
> I've done some profiling,
11 matches
Mail list logo
