Thanks for the answers!
This was the solution! :) (my fault was that I tried to use the "on" value
instead of true - don't know why..)
Gyuri
2011/7/30 Michael Sokolov
> On 7/30/2011 3:46 AM, Orosz György wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the answer!
>> I am doing some logging about stemming, and
On 7/30/2011 3:46 AM, Orosz György wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the answer!
I am doing some logging about stemming, and what I can see is that a lot of
tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange part, since I
don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming again.
Consider that t
> I am doing some logging about stemming, and what I can see
> is that a lot of
> tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange
> part, since I
> don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming
> again.
Highlighting do re-analyze the text being highlighted.
> Anyway my docmen
Hi,
Thanks for the answer!
I am doing some logging about stemming, and what I can see is that a lot of
tokens are stemmed for the highlighting. It is the strange part, since I
don't understand why does any highlighter need stemming again.
Anyway my docments are not really large, just a few kilobyt
I'm not sure I would identify stemming as the culprit here.
Do you have very large documents? If so, there is a patch for FVH
committed to limit the number of phrases it looks at; see
hl.phraseLimit, but this won't be available until 3.4 is released.
You can also limit the amount of each doc
