Btw, confirmed that this doesn't happen on our development stage with 3.6.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Jasper Floor wrote:
> The slave index does indeed grow over a period of time regardless of
> restarts. We do run on 1.4 however. We will be updating to 3.6 very
> soon however so I will see
The slave index does indeed grow over a period of time regardless of
restarts. We do run on 1.4 however. We will be updating to 3.6 very
soon however so I will see how that works out. Actually we should be
able to see this on our staging platform.
thanks everyone.
mvg,
Jasper
On Mon, May 14, 201
This is a known issue in 1.4 especially in Windows. Some of it was resolved in
3x.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On May 14, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, replication will require up to twice the space of the
> index _temporarily_, just checking if that's what you're seeing
Hmmm, replication will require up to twice the space of the
index _temporarily_, just checking if that's what you're seeing
But that should go away reasonably soon. Out of curiosity, what
happens if you restart your server, do the extra files go away?
But it sounds like your index is growing o
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi Jasper,
Sorry, I should've added more technical info wihtout being prompted.
> Solr does handle that for you. Some more stuff to share:
>
> * Solr version?
1.4
> * JVM version?
1.7 update 2
> * OS?
Debian (2.6.32-5-xen-amd64)
Hi Jasper,
Solr does handle that for you. Some more stuff to share:
* Solr version?
* JVM version?
* OS?
* Java replication?
* Errors in Solr logs?
* deletion policy section in solrconfig.xml?
* merge policy section in solrconfig.xml?
* ...
You may also want to look at your Index report in SPM
