climbingrose wrote:
It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often since it will be cached
separately from the query. The first query occuppies one cache entry while
the second one occuppies two cache entries, one in queryCac
Just correct myself, in the last setence, the first query is better if
fieldb:bar isn't reused often
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:02 PM, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
> fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often si
It depends on your query. The second query is better if you know that
fieldb:bar filtered query will be reused often since it will be cached
separately from the query. The first query occuppies one cache entry while
the second one occuppies two cache entries, one in queryCache and one in
filteredCa
Solr allows you to specify filters in separate parameters that are
applied to the main query, but cached separately.
q=the user query&fq=folder:f13&fq=folder:f24
I've been wanting more explanation around this for a while, so maybe now
is a good time to ask :)
the "cached separately" verbi
Thanks for the advice Yonik.
We have new users at least every few hours so it would be kinda
difficult to maintain the indexes this way. However, we do have a
smaller set of tokens describing the different subscription sets
available (<100). Basically, each folder_id is attached to a cert
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, in the plain text search, the user automatically searches through
> *all* of the folders to which they have subscribed. This means, for (good!)
> users who have subscribed to a large (1000+) number of folders, the
