Thanks Yonik. Yeah the additional facet fields being added by the client do
make it a little more complicated.
Matt
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> The spellcheck issue needs to be resolved.
>
> It doesn't seem like a good idea to access facet.fields by position
> though
The spellcheck issue needs to be resolved.
It doesn't seem like a good idea to access facet.fields by position
though - there has never been any guarantee about the order that these
come back in, and additional ones could be added as default parameters
for example.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimaginat
