Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-31 Thread anna headley
al Message- > From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:43 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Cc: Dyer, James > Subject: Re: replication, disk space > > Okay, I do have an index.properties file too, and THAT one does contain > the

RE: replication, disk space

2012-01-19 Thread Dyer, James
January 19, 2012 11:43 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Dyer, James Subject: Re: replication, disk space Okay, I do have an index.properties file too, and THAT one does contain the name of an index directory. But it's got the name of the timestamped index directory! Not sure how

Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-19 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Artem Lokotosh [mailto:arco...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:24 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: replication, disk space Which OS do you using? Maybe related to this Solr bug htt

Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-19 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
On 1/18/2012 1:53 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: As far as I know, the replication is supposed to delete the old directory index. However, the initial question is "why is this new index directory being created". Are you adding/updating documents in the slave? what about optimizing it? Are you r

Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-19 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
eans deleting "index". James Dyer E-Commerce Systems Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Artem Lokotosh [mailto:arco...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:24 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: replication, disk space Which OS

Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-19 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
Thanks for the response. I am using Linux (RedHat). It sounds like it may possibly be related to that bug. But the thing is, the timestamped index directory is looking to me like it's the _current_ one, with the non-timestamped one being an old out of date one. So that does not seem to be qui

Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-18 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
t being used, > even if that means deleting "index". > > James Dyer > E-Commerce Systems > Ingram Content Group > (615) 213-4311 > > -Original Message- > From: Artem Lokotosh [mailto:arco...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:2

RE: replication, disk space

2012-01-18 Thread Dyer, James
e- From: Artem Lokotosh [mailto:arco...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:24 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: replication, disk space Which OS do you using? Maybe related to this Solr bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:32 PM, J

Re: replication, disk space

2012-01-18 Thread Artem Lokotosh
Which OS do you using? Maybe related to this Solr bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1781 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > So Solr 1.4. I have a solr master/slave, where it actually doesn't poll for > replication, it only replicates irregularly when I issue