imator-lu
> cene-solr.xls
>
>
> From: "gururaj kosuru"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:28 AM
> To: "solr-user"
> Subject: Re: reg: efficient querying using solr
>
> Thanks Walter, Shawn and Otis for the
This might help (indirectly):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/dev-tools/size-estimator-lu
cene-solr.xls
From: "gururaj kosuru"
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:28 AM
To: "solr-user"
Subject: Re: reg: efficient
Thanks Walter, Shawn and Otis for the assistance, I will look into tuning
the parameters by experimenting as seems to be the only way to go.
On 11 June 2013 19:17, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/11/2013 12:15 AM, gururaj kosuru wrote:
> > How can one calculate an ideal max shard size for a solr cor
On 6/11/2013 12:15 AM, gururaj kosuru wrote:
> How can one calculate an ideal max shard size for a solr core instance if I
> am running a cloud with multiple systems of 4GB?
That question is impossible to answer without experimentation, but
here's a good starting point. That's all it is, a starti
You can't calculate it precisely, but you can test it. This is where EC2 is
handy.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jun 11, 2013 2:16 AM, "gururaj kosuru" wrote:
> How can one calculate an ideal max shard size for a solr core instance if I
> am running a cloud with multi
How can one calculate an ideal max shard size for a solr core instance if I
am running a cloud with multiple systems of 4GB?
Thanks
On 11 June 2013 11:18, Walter Underwood wrote:
> An index does not need to fit into the heap. But a 4GB machine is almost
> certainly too small to run Solr with 4
An index does not need to fit into the heap. But a 4GB machine is almost
certainly too small to run Solr with 40 million documents.
wunder
On Jun 10, 2013, at 10:36 PM, gururaj kosuru wrote:
> Hi Walter,
> thanks for replying. Do you mean that it is necessary for
> the index to
Hi Walter,
thanks for replying. Do you mean that it is necessary for
the index to fit into the heap? if so, will a heap size that is greater
than the actual RAM size slow down the queries?
Thanks,
Gururaj
On 11 June 2013 10:36, Walter Underwood wrote:
> 2GB is a rather small h
2GB is a rather small heap. Our production systems run with 8GB and smaller
indexes than that. Our dev and test systems run with 6GB heaps.
wunder
On Jun 10, 2013, at 9:52 PM, gururaj kosuru wrote:
> Hello,
> I have recently started using solr 3.4 and have a standalone
> system deployed