Re: realtime get requirements

2016-01-13 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
Hi Matteo, which Solr version are you using ? Prior to 5.1 , the building of the suggester was happening by default on startup, causing long waiting times ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6845 ) . If you are on a Solr >=5.1 I highly discourage the use of buildOnStartup=true if not a sp

Re: realtime get requirements

2016-01-12 Thread Erick Erickson
right, suggester had some bad behavior where it rebuilt on startup despite setting the flag to _not_ do that. See: Some details here: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/03/04/solr-suggester/ Best, Erick On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Matteo Grolla wrote: > ok, > suggester was responsible

Re: realtime get requirements

2016-01-12 Thread Matteo Grolla
ok, suggester was responsible for the long time to load. Thanks 2016-01-12 15:47 GMT+01:00 Matteo Grolla : > Thanks Shawn, > On a production solr instance some cores take a long time to load > while other of similar size take much less. One of the differences between > these cores is t

Re: realtime get requirements

2016-01-12 Thread Matteo Grolla
Thanks Shawn, On a production solr instance some cores take a long time to load while other of similar size take much less. One of the differences between these cores is the directoryFactory. 2016-01-12 15:34 GMT+01:00 Shawn Heisey : > On 1/12/2016 2:50 AM, Matteo Grolla wrote: > > and that

Re: realtime get requirements

2016-01-12 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/12/2016 2:50 AM, Matteo Grolla wrote: > and that it works with any directory factory? (Not just > NRTCachingDirectoryFactory) Realtime Get relies on the updateLog to return uncommitted documents, and standard Lucene mechanisms to return documents that have already been committed. It should w