Re: question about the fieldCollapseCache

2010-06-15 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
They used to be in the branches if I recall correctly but you're right. They aren't there anymore. Maybe someone else can explain why... it looks like they restructure the repository for the Solr/lucene merge. On 2010-06-15, at 4:54 AM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote: > Hi, > I tried downloading so

Re: question about the fieldCollapseCache

2010-06-15 Thread Rakhi Khatwani
Hi, I tried downloading solr 1.4.1 from the site. but it shows an empty directory. where did u get solr 1.4.1 from? Regards, Raakhi On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon < js.vac...@videotron.ca> wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been running some tests using 6 shards each one con

Re: question about the fieldCollapseCache

2010-06-09 Thread Martijn v Groningen
I agree. I'll add this information to the wiki. On 9 June 2010 14:32, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote: > ok great. > > I believe this should be mentioned in the wiki. > > Later > > On 2010-06-09, at 4:06 AM, Martijn v Groningen wrote: > >> The fieldCollapseCache should not be used as it is now, it us

Re: question about the fieldCollapseCache

2010-06-09 Thread Jean-Sebastien Vachon
ok great. I believe this should be mentioned in the wiki. Later On 2010-06-09, at 4:06 AM, Martijn v Groningen wrote: > The fieldCollapseCache should not be used as it is now, it uses too > much memory. It stores any information relevant for a field collapse > search. Like document collapse cou

Re: question about the fieldCollapseCache

2010-06-09 Thread Martijn v Groningen
The fieldCollapseCache should not be used as it is now, it uses too much memory. It stores any information relevant for a field collapse search. Like document collapse counts, collapsed document ids / fields, collapsed docset and uncollapsed docset (everything per unique search). So the memory usag