1. Use filter queries
> Here a example of query, there are any incorrect o anything that can I
> change?
> http://xxx:8893/solr/candidate/select/?q=+(IdCandidateStatus:2)+(IdCobranded:3)+(IdLocation1:12))+(LastLoginDate:[2011-08-26T00:00:00Z
> TO 2012-08-28T00:00:00Z])
What is the logic here? Are
13 GB index isn't too big, but going forward index sharding is the solutions
for large single core indexes. This way you can scale out.
This links will give you some info:
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/Distributed+Search+with+Index+Sharding
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination
Have you tried sharding ? The best practices recommend sharding when your
index grows too large and query time is slow.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, mpcmarcos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem, I'm working with Solr 3.5, with a index that has
> 8.000.000
> of documents (13Gb), each docum
How often the documents are added in the index? Try lessen down the optimize
frequency.
BTW do you optimize only on master (which should be the desired way).
Also specifically for dates ranges, try to use the filter queries, this way
it would be cached and would thus be faster. This would also a
I did notice that you use a lot of the sint/slong/sdouble field types
instead of the default int/long/double which are now the much more efficient
trie field types, even in Solr 3.5. I have no idea how much of your
lackluster performance is due to sint, et al, but I am sure that is a
contributi
... 21 more
Charles-André Martin
800 Square Victoria
Montréal (Québec) H4Z 0A3
Tél : (514) 504-2703
-Message d'origine-
De : simon [mailto:mtnes...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : August-10-11 1:52 PM
À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Objet : Re: query time problem
Off the top of my hea
Off the top of my head ...
Can you tell if GC is happening more frequently than usual/expected ?
Is the index optimized - if not, how many segments ?
It's possible that one of the shards is behind a flaky network connection.
Is the 10s performance just for the Solr query or wallclock time at
t
