Re: qt.shards in solrconfig.xml

2015-02-27 Thread Oleg Savrasov
Hi Benson, Shalin, One more thing that I noticed in your configuration is incorrect definition of default Solr parameters. You should use tag, not Oleg 2015-02-27 6:23 GMT+03:00 Shalin Shekhar Mangar : > Hi Benson, > > Do not use shards.qt with a leading '/'. See > https://issues.apache.org/j

Re: qt.shards in solrconfig.xml

2015-02-26 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Hi Benson, Do not use shards.qt with a leading '/'. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3161 for details. Also note that shards.qt will not be necessary with 5.1 and beyond because of SOLR-6311 On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I apparently am feeling dense;

Re: qt.shards in solrconfig.xml

2015-02-26 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
If I'm reading your suggestion right, Tim fixed this for 5.1 with http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6311 On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > I was hoping that Benson was hinting at adding a qt.shards.auto=true > parameter to so that would magically use on the path f

Re: qt.shards in solrconfig.xml

2015-02-26 Thread Benson Margulies
I apparently am feeling dense; the following does not worl. /RNI name-indexing-query name-indexing-rescore facet mlt highlight stats debug On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > I was hop

Re: qt.shards in solrconfig.xml

2015-02-26 Thread Jack Krupansky
I was hoping that Benson was hinting at adding a qt.shards.auto=true parameter to so that would magically use on the path from the incoming request - and that this would be the default, since that's what most people would expect. Or, maybe just add a commented-out custom handler that has the qt.sh

Re: qt.shards in solrconfig.xml

2015-02-26 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Giving http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201301.mbox/%3c711daae5-c366-4349-b644-8e29e80e2...@gmail.com%3E you can add qt.shards into handler defaults/invariants. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > A query I posted yesterday amounted to me f