(NOTE: this discussion probably makes more sense on solr-dev. future
replies should probably go there, or in SOLR-334.)
: The parser is a quick hack I threw together, and any value source
: factories should not be exposed to it. It seems like either
: 1) a value source factory would expose th
On 9/18/07, Jon Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reflection could be used to look up and invoke the constructor with
> appropriately-typed arguments. If we assume only "primitive" types
> and ValueSources are used, I don't think it would be too hard to craft
> a drop-in replacement that works w
On 9/18/07, Tom Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by a reflection based approach, but I've been
> thinking about doing this for a bit, since we needed it, too.
Reflection could be used to look up and invoke the constructor with
appropriately-typed arguments. If
Hi -
I'm not sure what you mean by a reflection based approach, but I've been
thinking about doing this for a bit, since we needed it, too.
I'd just thought about listing class names in the config file. The functions
would probably need to extend a subclass of ValueSource which will handle
argume
