Maybe it could throw an exception because the user is clearly trying
to do something impossible.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> You are missing the "pf", "pf2", and "pf3" request parameters, which says
> which fields to do phrase proximity boosting on.
>
> "pf" boosts usi
You are missing the "pf", "pf2", and "pf3" request parameters, which says
which fields to do phrase proximity boosting on.
"pf" boosts using the whole query as a phrase, "pf2" boosts bigrams, and
"pf3" boost trigrams.
You can use any combination of them, but if you use none of them, "ps"
app
: Can I set the phrase slop value to standard request handler? I want it
: to be configurable in solrconfig.xml file.
if you mean when a user enters a query like...
+fieldA:"some phrase" +(fieldB:true fieldC:1234)
..you want to be able to control what slop value gets used for "some
phr
I don't think there is a way to set that except in the dismax handler config.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: "Gargate, Siddharth"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 4:42:41 AM
> Subject: Phras
On 9-Jan-08, at 2:16 PM, anuvenk wrote:
I have a ps of 10 set in the config. so for search terms like 'work
injury' ,
results that have work and injury within 10 words of one another
are coming
up in the first few results which is good. But it also returns
results that
have work and injury
: How does adding a phrase slop in the handler help?
: I tried ps=25 along with some pf values. I assumed that it means this..for
: eg: a search term, 'child custody battle' means documents which have the
: words 'child','custody','battle' within 25 words of one another will rank
: high. Is that c
ja
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2008 1:50:42 AM
Subject: Re: phrase slop param in dismax handler
The lower ps , the better or vice vers
The lower ps , the better or vice versa? I'm guessing lower. I think that'll
make the search stricter. Is it correct?
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
> I'm not looking at the docs to double-check this, but the ps option lets
> you boost exact phrase matches higher.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://
I'm not looking at the docs to double-check this, but the ps option lets you
boost exact phrase matches higher.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: anuvenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January
