Re: performance variation with respect to the index size

2011-07-26 Thread François Schiettecatte
Finally got to running these tests. Here are the basics... Core i7 - 960 24GB RAM Solr index on its own drive Solr 3.3.0 running under tomcat 7.0.19, jdk1.6.0_26, java opts are: JAVA_OPTS="-Xmx4096M -XX:-UseGCOverheadLimit" Raw data is 80GB in SOLR marking for adding, sample below:

Re: performance variation with respect to the index size

2011-07-08 Thread Erick Erickson
Well, it depends (tm). Raw search time should be unaffected (or very close to that). The stored data is in a completely separate file in the index directory and is not referenced during searches. That said, assembling the response may take longer since you're potentially reading more data from the

Re: performance variation with respect to the index size

2011-07-08 Thread jame vaalet
i would prefer every setting to be in its default stage and compare the result with stored = true and False . 2011/7/8 François Schiettecatte > Hi > > I don't think that anyone has run such benchmarks, in fact this topic came > up two weeks ago and I volunteered some time to do that because I ha

Re: performance variation with respect to the index size

2011-07-08 Thread François Schiettecatte
Hi I don't think that anyone has run such benchmarks, in fact this topic came up two weeks ago and I volunteered some time to do that because I have some spare time this week, so I am going to run some benchmarks this weekend and report back. The machine I have to do this a core i7 960, 24GB,