Thank you three for your feedback!
Chantal, unfortuntately kenf is right. Facetting won't work in this special
case.
> parallel calls.
>
Yes, this will be the solution. However, this would lead to a second
HTTP-request and I hoped to be able to avoid it.
Chantal Ackermann wrote:
>
> Sure S
That just gives a count of documents by type. The use-case, I believe, is to
return from a search, 10 documents of type 'short' and 1 document of type
'extensive'.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p984539.html
Sure SOLR supports this: use facets on the field "type":
add to your regular query:
facet.query=true&facet.field=type
see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 15:48 +0200, kenf_nc wrote:
> parallel calls. simultaneously query for type:short rows=10 and
> typ
parallel calls. simultaneously query for type:short rows=10 and
type:extensive rows=1 and merge your results. This would also let you
separate your short docs from your extensive docs into different solr
instances if you wished...depending on your document architecture this could
speed up one o
I Think Solr does not provide any thing like that U want.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p983938.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Oh,... I just see, there is no direct question ;-).
How can I specify the number of returned documents in the desired way
*within* one request?
- Mitch
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p983773.html
Sent from
