Chris, Jack,
thank you for the detailed replies and help ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-help-understanding-an-issue-with-scoring-tp4002897p4003782.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: What is your query and "qf"?
FYI: these are both inlcuded in the original message (which was also
quoted in the reply below)
As jack points out, the differnece in score comes from thediffernece
in which fields are matched on.
Your high scoring example doc matches on *both* the
itemNo and
hello,
this is the query i am using:
cat goquery.sh
#!/bin/bash
SERVER=$1
PORT=$2
QUERY="http://$SERVER.blah.blah.com:${PORT}/solrpartscat/core1/select?qt=itemNoProductTypeBrandSearch&q=9030&rows=2000&debugQuery=on&fl=*,score";
curl -v $QUERY
--
View this message in context:
http://luc
What is your query and "qf"?
The first doc gets its high score due to a match on the
"itemNoExactMatchStr" field which the second doc doesn't have:
12.014634 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(itemNoExactMatchStr:9030 in 2308681),
With a low document frequency (inverts to high inverse document frequency):
looks like the original complete list of the results did not get attached to
this thread
here is a snippet of the list.
what i am trying to demonstrate, is the difference in scoring and
ultimately, sorting - and the breadth of documents (a few hundred) between
the two documents of interest (9030
update:
as an experiment - i changed the query to a wildcard (9030*) instead of an
explicit value (9030)
example:
QUERY="http://$SERVER.intra.searshc.com:${PORT}/solrpartscat/core1/select?qt=itemNoProductTypeBrandSearch&q=9030*&rows=2000&debugQuery=on&fl=*,score";
this resulted in a results lis
