haha, can't have that now!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Thanks for closing this out, I was breaking out in hives ;)
>
> Erick
>
Thanks for closing this out, I was breaking out in hives ;)
Erick
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:31 AM, John Blythe wrote:
> Looks like part of our nightly processing was restarting the solr server
> before all indexing was done bc of using a blunt object approach of doing
> so at designated times,
Looks like part of our nightly processing was restarting the solr server
before all indexing was done bc of using a blunt object approach of doing
so at designated times, doh!
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:35 PM John Blythe wrote:
> Thanks Erick. I don't think all of those ifs are in place. Must be
>
Thanks Erick. I don't think all of those ifs are in place. Must be
something in our nightly process that is conflicting. Will dive in tomorrow
to figure out and report back.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> First, are you absolutely sure you're committing before shutting do
First, are you absolutely sure you're committing before shutting down?
Hard commit in this case, openSearcher shouldn't matter.
SolrCloud? And if not SolrCloud, how are you shutting Solr down? "Kill
-9" is evil.
If you have transaction logs enabled then you shouldn't be losing
docs, any uncommitt