m: Roland Tollenaar
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: matching reponse and request
Hi Otis,
this is absolutely brilliant! I did not think it were possible.
It opens up a new possibility.
If I insert device ID's in this manner (as in a uni
_
>From: Roland Tollenaar
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 4:24 AM
>Subject: Re: matching reponse and request
>
>Hi Otis,
>
>this is absolutely brilliant! I did not think it were possible.
>
>It opens up a new possibility.
>
>If I
Hi,
actually your are right in the sense that this should be sorted out a
layer level lower. I.e. server-client connection level. Done that as well.
Thanks for the response.
Regards,
Roland
rkuris wrote:
I don't think you can do this.
If you are sending multiple GET requests, you are doin
Hi Otis,
this is absolutely brilliant! I did not think it were possible.
It opens up a new possibility.
If I insert device ID's in this manner (as in a unique identifier of the
device sending the request) , might it be possible to control (at least
block or permit) the permissions of the user
Hi Roland,
Check this:
0
0
on
0
solr
1 <=== from &foo=1
2.2
10
I added &foo=1 to the request to Solr and got the above back.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
I don't think you can do this.
If you are sending multiple GET requests, you are doing it across different
HTTP connections. The web service has no way of knowing these are related.
One solution would be to pass a spare, unused parameter to your request,
like sequenceId=NNN and get the response
