Got it. Thanks for clarifying.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Nick Vasilyev
> wrote:
> > Hi Yonik, I do see them in the response, but the JSON format is like
> > standard facet output. I am not sure what streaming facet response would
> >
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote:
> Hi Yonik, I do see them in the response, but the JSON format is like
> standard facet output. I am not sure what streaming facet response would
> look like, but I expected it to be similar to the streaming API. Is this
> the case?
Nope.
The
Hi Yonik, I do see them in the response, but the JSON format is like
standard facet output. I am not sure what streaming facet response would
look like, but I expected it to be similar to the streaming API. Is this
the case?
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> So it looks like
So it looks like facets are being computed... do you not see them in
the response?
-Yonik
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote:
> I enabled query debugging, here is the facet-trace snippet.
>
> "facet-trace":{
> "processor":"FacetQueryProcessor",
> "elapse":0,
>
I enabled query debugging, here is the facet-trace snippet.
"facet-trace":{
"processor":"FacetQueryProcessor",
"elapse":0,
"query":null,
"domainSize":43046041,
"sub-facet":[{
"processor":"FacetFieldProcessorStream",
"elapse":0,
"field
Perhaps try turning on request debugging and see what is actually
being received by Solr?
-Yonik
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote:
> I am on the nightly build of 6.1 and I am experimenting with json.facet
> streaming, however the response I am getting back looks like regular
