Re: indexing from Java

2006-04-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
Now *that* is an interesting idea! It is similar to the approach I want to go with a Solr Ruby library, such that all the HTTP stuff is hidden behind a clean domain-specific language of sorts. Erik On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Sure, I realize I could cr

Re: indexing from Java

2006-04-10 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Sure, I realize I could create the Lucene index myself, but like the : higher level abstraction that Solr is providing. Sorry, i guess i didn't explain myself very well. My point was that it should be possible to write a Java API which updated a Solr index (using SolrCore and all of the built

Re: indexing from Java

2006-04-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
Sure, I realize I could create the Lucene index myself, but like the higher level abstraction that Solr is providing. The disadvantage to creating the Lucene index myself or even with a Solr capability to take a Lucene Document is I'd lose the schema.xml goodness of things like and would h

Re: indexing from Java

2006-04-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 4/10/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this > : without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is there a clean way to > : leverage Solr's infrastructure without POSTing into it? I don't even > : need Solr running while in

Re: indexing from Java

2006-04-10 Thread Chris Hostetter
: In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this : without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is there a clean way to : leverage Solr's infrastructure without POSTing into it? I don't even : need Solr running while indexing. Is this possible easily? If so : what API should I b

Re: indexing from Java

2006-04-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 4/10/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm refactoring a command-line application that indexes RDF data to > index into Solr rather than directly into a Lucene index. > > In looking at the code, it looks like it'd be difficult to do this > without actually doing an HTTP POST. Or is