On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Spooky that you see incorrect results! The code looks correct. What
> are the specifics on when it produces an invalid result?
Figured this out -- the above code is not invalid, however i tried
versions that movedthe utf8ToString() th
Spooky that you see incorrect results! The code looks correct. What
are the specifics on when it produces an invalid result?
Also spooky that you see it running slower -- how much slower? Did
you rebuild the index in 4.x (if not, you are using the preflex
codec)? And is the index otherwise ide
