Re: force rsync update on a read-only index

2008-05-08 Thread Brian Whitman
Thanks otis and shalin.. didn't really think to do that. And that SOLR-527 sounds nice. For now we turned back on update but renamed it to update-ro so we don't add stuff to the slaves by accident :) and we changed the bin/commit script to hit update-ro. The slaves are already under an outs

Re: force rsync update on a read-only index

2008-05-08 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Here is that comment - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-527?focusedCommentId=12591678#action_12591678 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few weeks ago one person mentioned another way of making servers > read-only via file permissions. You

Re: force rsync update on a read-only index

2008-05-08 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
A few weeks ago one person mentioned another way of making servers read-only via file permissions. You may want to consider that instead of disabling /update. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Brian Whitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED