On 7/20/2017 3:27 PM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
> If the range query is so much better shouldn't the Solr query parser
> create a range query for a token query that only contains the
> wildcard? For the *:* case it does already contain a special path.
The *:* query is a special string. Although it
If the range query is so much better shouldn't the Solr query parser
create a range query for a token query that only contains the wildcard?
For the *:* case it does already contain a special path.
On 20.07.2017 21:00, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 7/20/2017 7:20 AM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
the Solr
One other possibility is to create a second boolean field "has_terms"
or something and just add an fq clause like "&fq=has_terms:false"
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/20/2017 7:20 AM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
>> the Solr 6.6. ref guide states that to "finds all doc
On 7/20/2017 7:20 AM, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
> the Solr 6.6. ref guide states that to "finds all documents without a
> value for field" you can use:
> -field:[* TO *]
>
> While this is true I'm wondering why it is recommended to use a range
> query instead of simply:
> -field:*
Performance.
A wil
forgot the link with the statement:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/the-standard-query-parser.html
On 20.07.2017 15:20, Hendrik Haddorp wrote:
Hi,
the Solr 6.6. ref guide states that to "finds all documents without a
value for field" you can use:
-field:[* TO *]
While this is true I
