On 5/2/2018 2:56 PM, Weffelmeyer, Stacie wrote:
> Question on faceting. We have a dynamicField that we want to facet
> on. Below is the field and the type of information that field generates.
>
>
>
> cid:image001.png@01D3E22D.DE028870
>
This image is not available. This mailing list will almos
Just a followup on this, I found that the method below using URL params
doesn't work when using the Rest API, if you try to set the field in your
facet object to something like "{!ex=dt}doctype" it throws an error. Here's
the documentation on the correct method to use with the API.
http://yonik.co
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> We can always use more documentation. One of the
> valuable things about people getting started is that it's an
> opportunity to clarify documents. Sometimes the people who
> develop/write the docs jump into the middle and assume
> the reade
>> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jamal, Sarfaraz <
>> > sarfaraz.ja...@verizonwireless.com.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thank you Andrew, that looks like exactly what I am looking for =)
>> >> Thank you Robert, it looks like we are both doing
re both doing it in similar fashion
> =)
> >> Thank you MaryJo for jumping right in!
> >>
> >> Sas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Andrew Chillrud [mailto:achill...@opentext.com]
> >> Sent: Thu
>> From: Andrew Chillrud [mailto:achill...@opentext.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:17 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
>>
>> It is possible to get the original facet counts for the field you are
>>
--Original Message-
> From: Andrew Chillrud [mailto:achill...@opentext.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:17 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
>
> It is possible to get the original facet counts for the field you are
> filtering
, 2016 2:17 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
It is possible to get the original facet counts for the field you are filtering
on (we have been using this since Solr 3.6). Don't know if this can be extended
to get the original counts for all fields ho
t;>> **select?q=video&hl=true&hl.fl=*&hl.snippets=20&facet=true&facet.field=team
>>>
>>> Then when I specify which team
>>> http://
>>>
>>> **select?q=video&hl=true&hl.fl=*&hl.snippets=20&facet=true&
separating them with commas.
- Andy -
-Original Message-
From: Robert Brown [mailto:r...@intelcompute.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
MaryJo, I think you've mis-understood. The counts are different
.snippets=20&facet=true&facet.field=team&fq=team:rollback
The counts are obviously different now, as the result set is limited to
one team.
Sas
-Original Message-
From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
iously different now, as the result set is limited to
> one team.
>
> Sas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [E] Re: Faceting Question(s)
&g
s=20&facet=true&facet.field=team&fq=team:rollback
The counts are obviously different now, as the result set is limited to one
team.
Sas
-Original Message-
From: MaryJo Sminkey [mailto:mjsmin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 1:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
In other words... to diagnose such a problem it would really help to see
the exact parameters and filters you are using on each of the searches.
Mary Jo
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Jamal, Sarfaraz <
sarfaraz.ja...@verizonwireless.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am working on impl
Jamai - what is your q= set to? And do you have a fq for the original
query? I have found that if you do a wildcard search (*.*) you have to be
careful about other parameters you set as that can often result in the
numbers returned being off. In my case, my defaults had things like edismax
settings
Thanks, I'll take a look. Do you happen to know if it works with dates?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Alexey Serba wrote:
> Seems like pivot faceting is what you looking for (
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Pivot_.28ie_Decision_Tree.29_Faceting
> )
>
> Note: it curren
Seems like pivot faceting is what you looking for (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Pivot_.28ie_Decision_Tree.29_Faceting
)
Note: it currently does not work in distributed mode - see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jamie Johnson
Sorry some more info. I have a field to store source and another for date.
I currently use faceting to get a temporal distribution across all
sources. What is the best way to get a temporal distribution per source?
Is the only thing I can do to execute 1 query for the list of sources and
then an
Hi,
It's quite coincidental that I was just about to ask this very
question to the forum experts.
I think this is the same sort of thing Jamie was asking about. (the
only difference in my question is that the values won't be known at
query time)
Is it possible to create a request that will return
> Does
> that make more sense?
Ah I see.
I'm not certain but take a look at pivot faceting
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792
cheers lee c
I'm not sure that will give me what I want, most likely because I was
clear what I'm looking for. I would like to take this information and
populate a chart so you could see how many documents were created over
time of a particular type. So basically I need the range queries so I
can populate the
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Lee Carroll
wrote:
> if "type" is a field use field faceting with an fq
>
> q=datefield:[start TO end]&fq=type:(a b c)&facet.field=type
Yep, that will work too.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out a way to execute a query which would allow me
> to say there were x documents over this period of time with type a, y
> documents over the same period of time with type b and z documents
> over the same period of tim
if "type" is a field use field faceting with an fq
q=datefield:[start TO end]&fq=type:(a b c)&facet.field=type
On 14 January 2012 17:56, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out a way to execute a query which would allow me
> to say there were x documents over this period of time with
I do have it as a text_ws field. The field list is pretty long, and
the two around it are strings. So, my bad.
Thanks all!
-- Chris
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
>
> What index analyzer or field settings are you using for that field? Sounds
> like it might be tokenized. Maybe loo
What index analyzer or field settings are you using for that field? Sounds
like it might be tokenized. Maybe look at alternatives that don't tokenize
fields. Just a guess here though. Good luck.
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:04:00 -0500, Christopher Gross
wrote:
> My index has a multi-valued String fie
Can you send the schema you are using?
Looks like you are using WhiteSpace / StandardAnalyzer for the tag field.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Christopher Gross wrote:
> My index has a multi-valued String field called "tag" that is used to
> store a category/keyword for the item the record is
Hi Mark,
I think you would need to issue two seperate queries. Its also a, I was
going to say odd
usecase but who am I to judge, interesting usecase. If you have a faceted
navigation front
end you are in real danger of confusing your users. I suppose its a case of
what do you want to achieve? Facet
No mixup. I probably didn't explain myself correctly.
Suppose my document has fields "title", "description" and "foo". When I
search I would like to search across "title" and "description". I then
would like facet counts on "foo" for documents that matched the "title"
field only. IE, I would l
Hi,
I think there is a bit of a mixup here. Facets are not about which field a
match was on, but about what values hits have in one or more fields you facet
on.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Ori
Hmm, thanks for the response. I'll play around with it and see if that
helps.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceting-Question-tp2320542p2321887.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> &fq={!tag=tag1}tags:( |1003| |1007|) AND tags:(
>|10015|)&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&facet=on&facet.field={!ex=tag1}category&facet.field=capacity&facet.field=brand
I'm just guessing here, but perhaps {!tag=tag1} is only picking up the 'tags:(
|1003| |1007|) '-part. If so {!ex=tag1} wo
Thanks Yonik.
If it is using enum method then it should also be caching the facet query
for every indexed value for the facet fields.
1) Do I need to add filterCache and hashDocSet entry to the solrconfig.xml
for this caching to happen.?
I did not find any noticeable difference in query time
It would be the enum method... Solr 1.3 doesn't have the "fc" method
for multi-valued fields... that's a 1.4 feature.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:44 AM, rayandev wrote:
>
> I am using the faceting feature and it works, I get back the facet counts,
> but I ne
: is there no other way then to use the patch?
the patch was commited a while back, but it will require experimenting
with the trunk.
: > If I understand correctly,
: > 1. You want to query for tagList:a AND tagList:b AND tagList:c
: > 2. At the same time, you want to request facets for tagList
is there no other way then to use the patch?
since the query A is super set of B ???
if not doable, I will probably use some caching technique.
Best.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Cam Bazz wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>> I got a mult
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Cam Bazz wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I got a multiField named tagList which may contain multiple tags. I am
> making a query like:
>
> tagList:a AND tagList:b AND tagList:c
>
> and I am also getting a tagList facet returning me some values.
>
> What I would like is Solr t
nt: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Faceting question
Thanks Peter. That will be my work-around, but I was hoping to find a
more elegant solution ;) I am not that knowledgeable about the solr
architecture but if there is a way it can be done in a more ele
gt; had a similar situation and found that getting away from a
> relational-database approach and going with what Solr does best was the
> best solution).
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Peter
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cric Digs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Se
al-database approach and going with what Solr does best was the
best solution).
Hope that helps,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Cric Digs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Faceting question
lol I agree with you
lol I agree with you Hoss - sorry for that
Here's the thing:
I need additional information from the index - such as the id related to a
facet field. For example, say I am faceting on author names for a book
store, I would also like to get the author id along with the author name to
show a link (ne
You mean, when it says that facet term "foo" has 10 documents, you want
those 10 ids? I think that will require a further query from your
application.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Cric Digs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 12:43 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apac
: I'm using faceting to get some results. I also want to get another field -
: the id field along with it. Is it possible to get that somehow in the facet
: results?
you're going to have to elaborate on what it is you are trying to do ... i
genuinely have no idea what you are asking (and i think
Thanks Chris. DUMB of me not to have noticed.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : : omitNorms="true"/>
> :
>
> your "fhild_catname" isn't using "string" as it's field type -- it's using
> "text" (which is most likely using TextField and being tokenized)
>
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View
:
:
your "fhild_catname" isn't using "string" as it's field type -- it's using
"text" (which is most likely using TextField and being tokenized)
-Hoss
45 matches
Mail list logo
