Re: "facet.mincount=0" returns facet values with 0 counts for "q=*" query

2014-12-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
in general, a facet count of 0 means the term is in the index but does not match an of the docs in the result set. if you are doing a query that matches all docs, and seeing facet values with a mincount of 0, that means the *term* is still in the index, but the documents that contained those t

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Isan Fulia
Thanks to all On 3 February 2011 20:21, Grijesh wrote: > > Hi > > facet.mincount not works with facet.date option afaik. > There is an issue for it as solr-343, but resolved. > Try apply patch, provided as a solution in this issue may solve the > problem. > Fix version for this may be 1.5 > > --

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Grijesh
Hi facet.mincount not works with facet.date option afaik. There is an issue for it as solr-343, but resolved. Try apply patch, provided as a solution in this issue may solve the problem. Fix version for this may be 1.5 - Thanx: Grijesh http://lucidimagination.com -- View this message in con

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
ahh..I see your point..well if that's true, then facet.missing/facet.method are also not supported? I'm not sure if this is the case, or the Date Faceting Parameters = Field Value Faceting Parameters + the extra ones. Maybe the page author(s) can clarify. On 3 February 2011 11:32, dan sutton wr

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread dan sutton
facet.mincount is grouped only under field faceting parameters not date faceting parameters On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I'm probably just not able to spot this, but where does the wiki page > mention that the facet.mincount is not applicable on da

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Grijesh
I am also not getting where in wiki its mention that facet.mincount will not work with date faceting. But I have checked by query its not working with me also. Have to report a bug. - Thanx: Grijesh http://lucidimagination.com -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
Hi Dan, I'm probably just not able to spot this, but where does the wiki page mention that the facet.mincount is not applicable on date fields? On 3 February 2011 10:55, Isan Fulia wrote: > I am using solr1.4.1 release version > I got the following error while using facet.mincount > java.lang.I

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Isan Fulia
I am using solr1.4.1 release version I got the following error while using facet.mincount java.lang.IllegalStateException: STREAM at org.mortbay.jetty.Response.getWriter(Response.java:571) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspWriterImpl.initOut(JspWriterImpl.java:158) at org.apac

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread dan sutton
I don't think facet.mincount works with date faceting, see here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters Dan On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Isan Fulia wrote: > Any query followed by > > &facet=on&facet.date=aUpdDt&facet.date.start=2011-01-02T08:00:00.000Z&facet.date.end=2011-02-03T0

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Grijesh
Have you seen your log file ,what saying the log file . Is there any exception occur? I have never seen that facet.mincont=1 not working. What version of solr you are using? - Thanx: Grijesh http://lucidimagination.com -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/face

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Isan Fulia
Any query followed by &facet=on&facet.date=aUpdDt&facet.date.start=2011-01-02T08:00:00.000Z&facet.date.end=2011-02-03T08:00:00.000Z&facet.date.gap=%2B1HOUR&facet.mincount=1 On 3 February 2011 15:14, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis < savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com> wrote: > could you post the que

Re: facet.mincount

2011-02-03 Thread Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
could you post the query you are submitting to Solr? On 3 February 2011 09:33, Isan Fulia wrote: > Hi all, > Even after making facet.mincount=1 , it is showing the results with count = > 0. > Does anyone know why this is happening. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Isan Fulia. >