Re: dynamic field question

2013-10-09 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
David, Yes. Document grouping (aka field collapsing) will help you here. It should also allow you to create a better search experience on the front end - it's often better to narrow down where in a large document a match is than give users a large doc and say: we know the match is in here somewhe

Re: dynamic field question

2013-10-09 Thread Twomey, David
OK. Then the JSON returned would contain a lot of documents that are really sections. This would work fine for the use-case I mentioned but I also use the index for full-text search of the whole document. Therefore, I would need to parse the result JSON in a way that combines the solr docs return

Re: dynamic field question

2013-10-09 Thread Aloke Ghoshal
Hi David, A separate Solr document for each section is a good option if you also need to handle phrases, case, special characters, etc. within the title field. How do you map them to dynamic fields? E.g.: "Appendix for cities", "APPENDIX 1: Cities" Regards, Aloke On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM

Re: dynamic field question

2013-10-08 Thread Jack Krupansky
I'd suggest that each of your source document sections would be a distinct solr document. All of the sections could have a "source document ID" field to tie them together. Dynamic fields work best when used in moderation. Your use case seems like an excessive use of dynamic fields. -- Jack K