the text field as a phrase of contiguous terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Andreas Hubold
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 12:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: dismax query does not match with additional field in qf
Okay, sounds reasonable. However I did
ubject: Re: dismax query does not match with additional field in qf
Okay, sounds reasonable. However I didn't expect this when reading the
documentation of the dismax query parser.
Especially the need to escape special characters (and which ones) was
not clear to me as the dismax query parser
Okay, sounds reasonable. However I didn't expect this when reading the
documentation of the dismax query parser.
Especially the need to escape special characters (and which ones) was
not clear to me as the dismax query parser "is designed to process
simple phrases (without complex syntax) ente
I think what is happening is that your last term, the naked apostrophe is
analyzing to zero terms and simply being ignored, but when you add the extra
field, a string field, you now have another term in the query, and you have
mm set to 100%, so that "new" term must match. It probably fails beca
Andreas Hubold wrote on 09/30/2014 05:14 PM:
I ran into a problem with the Solr dismax query parser.
...
I'd expect that an additional field in the qf parameter would not lead
to fewer matches.
Okay, the above example is a rather crude test but I'd like to
understand it. Is this a bug in Solr?
