"text" and the
code won't check the defaultSearchField if "df" is set.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 4:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: defaultSearchField not working after upgrade to
: So if defaultSearchField has been removed (deprecated) from schema.xml then
why
: are the still calls to
"org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName()"?
Because even though the syntax is deprecated/discouraged in schema.xml, we
don't want things to break for existing users
: Correct. In 3.6 it is simply ignored. In 4.x it currently does work.
That's not true.
the example cofigs in Solr 3.6 no longer mention defaultSearchField,
but Solr 3.6 will still respect a declaration if
it exists in your schema.xml -- I just verified this by running Solr 3.6
using hte Sol
Correct. In 3.6 it is simply ignored. In 4.x it currently does work.
Generally, Solr ignores any elements that it does not support.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rohit
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: defaultSearchField
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: defaultSearchField not working after upgrade to solr3.6
Just to clarify one point from my original response, the "df" parameter is
already set for the default request handlers, so all you need to do is
change it from the "text" field to your pre
eld element is
present.
The issue is still open for 4.x.
Feel free to comment directly on that Jira.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rohit
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 9:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: defaultSearchField not working after upgrade to s
...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: 11 June 2012 18:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: defaultSearchField not working after upgrade to solr3.6
Add the "df" parameter to your query request handler. It names the default
field. Or use "qf" for the edismax query parser.
-- Jack Krup
Add the "df" parameter to your query request handler. It names the default
field. Or use "qf" for the edismax query parser.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rohit
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 8:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: defaultSearchField not working afte
Besides the obvious need to clean up the getDefaultSearchFieldName
references, I would also suggest that the "df" param have a hard-wired
default of "text" since that is the obvious default.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Fehling
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 10:15 AM
thank you all ;)
2010/5/19 Jan Kammer
> There is something called dismax-requesthandler. I think this is what you
> are looking for.
>
> greetz, Jan
>
>
> Am 19.05.2010 15:47, schrieb Antonello Mangone:
>
> Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if it's possible to use the *
>> defaultSearchField* on
There is something called dismax-requesthandler. I think this is what
you are looking for.
greetz, Jan
Am 19.05.2010 15:47, schrieb Antonello Mangone:
Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if it's possible to use the *
defaultSearchField* on more fields ???
i.e.
field1, field2, field3
Thanks
> Hi to everyone, I'd like to know if
> it's possible to use the *
> defaultSearchField* on more fields ???
>
> i.e.
>
> field1, field2, field3
>
>
No. But you can query multiple fields using dismax.
qf=field1,field2,field3&defType=dismax
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Erik Hatcher
wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Mani Kumar wrote:
>
>> @mark, @otis:
>>
>
> Can I answer too? :)
>
your welcome :) ... thanks
>
>
> yeah copying all the fields to one text field will work but what if i want
>> to assign specific weightage
On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Mani Kumar wrote:
@mark, @otis:
Can I answer too? :)
yeah copying all the fields to one text field will work but what if
i want
to assign specific weightage to specific fields?
e.g. i have a three fields
1) title
2) tags
3) description
i copied all of them
@mark, @otis:
yeah copying all the fields to one text field will work but what if i want
to assign specific weightage to specific fields?
e.g. i have a three fields
1) title
2) tags
3) description
i copied all of them to a new field called "all_text".
now i want to search in all the fields with
Jörg Agatz wrote:
Hallo Users...
And good Morning, in germany it is morning :-)
I have a realy important Prroblem...
My Fields are realy Bad.. Like
"CUPS_EBENE1_EBENE2_TASKS_CATEGORIE"
I have no Content field ore somthing like this...
So when i will search somthing, i need to search in ALL fie
Jörg,
You can use copyField to copy all fields into a single fields that has all
other fields' content.
Then you can put that "catch all" field as the default search field.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Jörg Agatz
> To
17 matches
Mail list logo
