Re: catchall field minus one field

2012-01-12 Thread elisabeth benoit
thanks a lot for your advice, I'll try that. Best regards, Elisabeth 2012/1/11 Erick Erickson > Hmmm, Once the data is included in the catch-all, it's indistinguishable > from > all the rest of the data, so I don't see how you could do this. A clause > like: > -excludeField:[* TO *] would exclu

Re: catchall field minus one field

2012-01-11 Thread Erick Erickson
Hmmm, Once the data is included in the catch-all, it's indistinguishable from all the rest of the data, so I don't see how you could do this. A clause like: -excludeField:[* TO *] would exclude all documents that had any data in the field so that's probably not what you want. Could you approac