hossman wrote:
>
> it ensures the schema creator must clearly thinks through exactly what
> should be copied where -- otherwise you might have an existing mappings
> of x->z and y->z that you don't consider/remember when adding a->x (or
> worse: a->x and a->y)
>
Hmm, I can see your reasoni
: I recently discovered that the copyFields directive exclusively works for
: copying fields from the input doc to the indexed/stored doc.
correct. you have to explicitly list the mappings, it's not recursive (as
i recall this was done partially because it was easier, but also because
it ensur
Batzenmann wrote:
>
> cahining
>
and meant: 'chaining' -
sry for spamming,
Axel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cahining-copyFields-tp19839265p19839530.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
