Yes I also did see the exclude="true" in an example elevate.xml...was
wondering what it does precisely and if "text" MUST have a value ? I couldnt
find any documentation explaining it
Ravi Kiran Bhaskar
Principal Software Engineer
Washington Post
1150 15th Street NW, Washington, DC
Mr.Rochkind pointed out the exact requirement I had in mind i.e. "filter
query from external list of Solr unique IDs". On the flip side, even filter
queries can be dicey for me as I could very easily blow past the 1024 bytes
URL GET limit as my original queries itself are very long..just adding 100
[mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 3:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: blacklist docs by uniqueKey
I don't believe there is, but it occurs to me that the additional
feature that Tom Burton-West contemplates in the thread "filter query
from external li
How does the exclude="true" option in elevate.xml perform with large number of
excludes?
Then you could have a separate elevate config for that client.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 3. nov. 2010, at 20.11, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010
I don't believe there is, but it occurs to me that the additional
feature that Tom Burton-West contemplates in the thread "filter query
from external list of Solr unique IDs" could potentially address your
problem too, if it existed. I think that feature could also address a
variety of problems
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> How dynamic is this list? Is it feasable to add a field to your docs like
> blacklisteddocs, and at editorial's discretion add values to that field
> like "app1", "app2"?
>
> At that point you can just filter them out via a filter query...
R
How dynamic is this list? Is it feasable to add a field to your docs like
blacklisteddocs, and at editorial's discretion add values to that field
like "app1", "app2"?
At that point you can just filter them out via a filter query...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
>
