Re: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-22 Thread Erick Erickson
${socketTimeout:0} > > to > > ${socketTimeout:60} > > -Original Message- > From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:19 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 > > In some colle

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-22 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
For the record, the solution was to edit solr.xml changing ${socketTimeout:0} to ${socketTimeout:60} -Original Message- From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:19 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 In some

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-19 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:53 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 FYI, I DO succeed in doing an async backup in Solr8.1 -Original Message- From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:03 AM To: solr

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-19 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
FYI, I DO succeed in doing an async backup in Solr8.1 -Original Message- From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:03 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 This is on a test server: simple case: one node, one shard

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-19 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
19, 2019 12:40 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 Hello, Craig. There was a significant fix for async BACKUP in 8.1, if I remember it correctly. Which version you used for it before? How many nodes, shards, replicas `bug` has? Unfortunately this stacktrace is not really

Re: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-18 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Craig. There was a significant fix for async BACKUP in 8.1, if I remember it correctly. Which version you used for it before? How many nodes, shards, replicas `bug` has? Unfortunately this stacktrace is not really representative, it just says that some node (ok, it's overseer) fails to wait

Re: async backup

2017-06-27 Thread Damien Kamerman
yes. Requeststatus is returning state=completed prematurely. On Tuesday, 27 June 2017, Amrit Sarkar wrote: > Damien, > > then I poll with REQUESTSTATUS > > > REQUESTSTATUS is an API which provided you the status of the any API > (including other heavy duty apis like SPLITSHARD or CREATECOLLECTIO

Re: async backup

2017-06-27 Thread Amrit Sarkar
Damien, then I poll with REQUESTSTATUS REQUESTSTATUS is an API which provided you the status of the any API (including other heavy duty apis like SPLITSHARD or CREATECOLLECTION) associated with async_id at that current timestamp / moment. Does that give you "state"="completed"? Amrit Sarkar Sea

Re: async backup

2017-06-26 Thread Damien Kamerman
A regular backup creates the files in this order: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 63 Jun 27 09:46 snapshot.shard7 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 159 Jun 27 09:46 snapshot.shard8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 135 Jun 27 09:46 snapshot.shard1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17

Re: async backup

2017-06-26 Thread Damien Kamerman
Yes, the async command returns, and then I poll with REQUESTSTATUS. On 27 June 2017 at 01:24, Varun Thacker wrote: > Hi Damien, > > A backup command with async is supposed to return early. It is start the > backup process and return. > > Are you using the REQUESTSTATUS ( > http://lucene.apache.o

Re: async backup

2017-06-26 Thread Varun Thacker
Hi Damien, A backup command with async is supposed to return early. It is start the backup process and return. Are you using the REQUESTSTATUS ( http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/collections-api.html#collections-api ) API to validate if the backup is complete? On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 10:28