Re: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-22 Thread Erick Erickson
${socketTimeout:0} > > to > > ${socketTimeout:60} > > -Original Message- > From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:19 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 > > In some colle

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-22 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
For the record, the solution was to edit solr.xml changing ${socketTimeout:0} to ${socketTimeout:60} -Original Message- From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:19 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 In some

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-19 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:53 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 FYI, I DO succeed in doing an async backup in Solr8.1 -Original Message- From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:03 AM To: solr

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-19 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
FYI, I DO succeed in doing an async backup in Solr8.1 -Original Message- From: Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:03 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 This is on a test server: simple case: one node, one shard

RE: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-19 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
19, 2019 12:40 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: async BACKUP under Solr8.3 Hello, Craig. There was a significant fix for async BACKUP in 8.1, if I remember it correctly. Which version you used for it before? How many nodes, shards, replicas `bug` has? Unfortunately this stacktrace is not really

Re: async BACKUP under Solr8.3

2019-11-18 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Craig. There was a significant fix for async BACKUP in 8.1, if I remember it correctly. Which version you used for it before? How many nodes, shards, replicas `bug` has? Unfortunately this stacktrace is not really representative, it just says that some node (ok, it's overseer) fails to wait