yes , it does . it just blindly creates hard links irrespective of a
document is added or not. but no snappull will happen because there is
no new file to be downloaded
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Hi Noble,
>
> So ok I don't mind really if it miss one, if it get the last o
Hi Noble,
So ok I don't mind really if it miss one, if it get the last one it's good.
I've was wondering as well if a snapshot is created even if no document has
been update?
Thanks a lot Noble,
Wish you a very nice day,
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> I guess , it should not be a probl
I guess , it should not be a problem
--Noble
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:28 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Hi Hoss,
>
> Is it a problem if the snappuller miss one snapshot before the last one ??
>
> Cheer,
> Have a nice day,
>
>
> hossman wrote:
>>
>> :
>> : There are a couple queries that we would like to
Hi Hoss,
Is it a problem if the snappuller miss one snapshot before the last one ??
Cheer,
Have a nice day,
hossman wrote:
>
> :
> : There are a couple queries that we would like to run almost realtime so
> : I would like to have it so our client sends an update on every new
> : document and
:
: There are a couple queries that we would like to run almost realtime so
: I would like to have it so our client sends an update on every new
: document and then have solr configured to do an autocommit every 5-10
: seconds.
:
: reading the Wiki, it seems like this isn't possible because of the
At Infoseek, we ran a separate search index with today's updates
and merged that in once each day. It requires a little bit of
federated search to prefer the new content over the big index,
but the daily index can be very nimble for update.
wunder
On 8/22/07 7:58 AM, "mike topper" <[EMAIL PROTECT
