Thanks Erik,
I observed the wrong behaviour on 4.6 in a controlled environment with
a very simple test case, so It's was probably a bug (or I was drunk ;-) )
Really thanks again!!!
2015-11-18 17:40 GMT+01:00 Erick Erickson :
> Then that was probably a bug in 4.6. There's a lot
> of work that
Then that was probably a bug in 4.6. There's a lot
of work that's been done since then, and distributed
updates that are mixed like this are particularly
"interesting".
So you should be able to count on this.
One other possibility: Is it possible that this was a false
failure in 4.6 and a commit
Thanks Shawn,
I'm aware that solr isn't transactional and I don't need this property:
a single application is indexing.
With solr 4.6 I was noting a different behaviour, with 4.10 I'm observing
the desired one.
I'd like to know If I can count on this behaviour to be maintained by
successive solr
On 11/18/2015 8:21 AM, Matteo Grolla wrote:
> On Solr 4.10.3 I'm noting a different (desired) behaviour
>
> 1) add document x
> 2) delete document x
> 3) commit
>
> document x doesn't get indexed.
If the last operation for document X is to delete it, then it will be
gone after the commit and not
On Solr 4.10.3 I'm noting a different (desired) behaviour
1) add document x
2) delete document x
3) commit
document x doesn't get indexed.
The question now is: Can I count on this behaviour or is it just incidental?
2014-11-05 22:21 GMT+01:00 Matteo Grolla :
> Perfectly clear,
> thanks
Perfectly clear,
thanks a lot!
Il giorno 05/nov/2014, alle ore 13:48, Jack Krupansky ha scritto:
> Document x doesn't exist - in terms of visibility - until the commit, so the
> delete will no-op since a query of Lucene will not "see" the uncommitted new
> document.
>
> -- Jack Krupans
Document x doesn't exist - in terms of visibility - until the commit, so the
delete will no-op since a query of Lucene will not "see" the uncommitted new
document.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Matteo Grolla
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.
Do you have soft commits enabled by any chance in solrconfig.XML?
Regards,
Alex
On 05/11/2014 4:48 am, "Matteo Grolla" wrote:
> Can anyone tell me the behavior of solr (and if it's consistent) when I do
> what follows:
> 1) add document x
> 2) delete document x
> 3) commit
>
> I've tried wit
