Re: Zookeeper down question

2013-11-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
garthgr...@averyranchconsulting.com> wrote: > Thanks Mark and Tim. My understanding has been upgraded. > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:59 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Zookeeper down

RE: Zookeeper down question

2013-11-19 Thread Garth Grimm
Thanks Mark and Tim. My understanding has been upgraded. -Original Message- From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:59 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Zookeeper down question On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Timothy Potter wrote

Re: Zookeeper down question

2013-11-19 Thread Mark Miller
On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: > Good questions ... From my understanding, queries will work if Zk goes down > but writes do not work w/o Zookeeper. This works because the clusterstate > is cached on each node so Zookeeper doesn't participate directly in queries > and indexin

Re: Zookeeper down question

2013-11-19 Thread Timothy Potter
Good questions ... From my understanding, queries will work if Zk goes down but writes do not work w/o Zookeeper. This works because the clusterstate is cached on each node so Zookeeper doesn't participate directly in queries and indexing requests. Solr has to decide not to allow writes if it loses