Screen captures generally get filtered out by the Apache e-mail, it didn't come
through.
But this makes no sense. The text_en field type you pasted should not
be having the problems you're talking about.
So if you add debug=true, you should be seeing your "Wednesday" query
going against your fiel
You were right about finding only the Wednesday occurrences at the
beginning of the line. But attached (if it works) is a screen capture
of my admin UI. But unlike your suspicion, the index text is being
parsed properly, it appears. So I'm uncertain where this leads me.
Also attached is the
bq: However, I discovered that if I search on "Wednesday*" (trailing
asterisk), then I get all the results containing Wednesday that I'm
looking for!
This almost always means you're not searching on the field you think
you're searching on and/or the field isn't being analyzed as you think
(i.e. th
Ok, Erick, you provided useful info to help with my understanding.
However, I still get zero results when I search on literal text (e.g.,
"Wednesday"), even with making changes that you suggest. However, I
discovered that if I search on "Wednesday*" (trailing asterisk), then I
get all the resul
bq: There is no fieldType defined in my solrconfig.xml, unless you are
referring to this line:
Well, that's because you should be looking in schema.xml ;).
This line from your stacktrace file is very suspicious:
logtext:Wednesday
It _looks_ like your logtext file is perhaps a "string" type
On 9/18/2015 8:33 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
The "field:*" syntax is something you should not get in the habit of
using. It is a wildcard search. What this does under the covers is
looks up all the possible terms in that field across the entire index,
and constructs a Lucene query that actually i
On 9/18/2015 5:53 PM, Mark Fenbers wrote:
> Using the browser interface to run a query on my indexed data,
> specifying "q=logtext:*" gives me all 9800+ documents indexed -- as
> expected. But if I specify something like "q=logtext:Sunday", then I
> get zero results even though ~1000 documents con
What's the debug info (debug=true) for that query? Did you by chance change
field types or query parser?
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 19:53, Mark Fenbers wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> Using the browser interface to run a query on my indexed data, specifying
> "q=logtext:*" gives me all 9800+ documents
