On 3/3/06, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use Term Vectors quite a bit, in fact, I was thinking of having a go at a
> patch (so if you want to point me at where to begin)...
The schema should already parse and accept the following attributes on
either a fieldtype or field definit
Great minds think alike :-)
Yeah, it is a bit eerie how similar they are, but I think they both go to solve
a similar issue (mine started out with the desire to have only one Analyzer
that I could configure with different filters, believe it or not, and grew from
there). The biggest difference
Grant, I just today got a chance to page through your ApacheCon Lucene
presentation.
I did a double-take when I paged across your "sample configuration" slide.
WIld how similar some of it looks to Solr's schema!
So since it seems like your stuff has it's own schema too, do you see
any features nee
On 2/26/06, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an XML schema available for schema.xml? If not, what Java files are
> best to look at for understanding what options can be set?
There is currently no schema.
Everything useful should be in the example schema though.
For fields:
