On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Robert Purdy wrote:
>
> Thanks for the Good information :) Well I haven't had any evictions in any of
> the caches in years, but the hit ratio is 0.51 in queryResultCache, 0.77 in
> documentCache, 1.00 in the fieldValueCache, and 0.99 in the filterCache. So
> in yo
Thanks for the Good information :) Well I haven't had any evictions in any of
the caches in years, but the hit ratio is 0.51 in queryResultCache, 0.77 in
documentCache, 1.00 in the fieldValueCache, and 0.99 in the filterCache. So
in your opinion should the documentCache and queryResultCache use th
2009/6/4 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> FastLRUCache is designed to be lock free so it is well suited for
> caches which are hit several times in a request. I guess there is no
> harm in using FastLRUCache across all the caches.
Gets are cheaper, but evictions are more expensive. If the cache hit
FastLRUCache is designed to be lock free so it is well suited for
caches which are hit several times in a request. I guess there is no
harm in using FastLRUCache across all the caches.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Robert Purdy wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> Anyone got any advice on which caches (fi
