On 4/30/2014 3:47 PM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
> Thank you Shawn and Erick for the quick response.
>
>
> A follow up question.
>
>
> Basedon
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-Thefq%28FilterQuery%29Parameter,I
> see the "fl" (field lis
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
To: solr-user
Sent: Wed, Apr 30, 2014 5:33 pm
Subject: Re: Which Lucene search syntax is faster
I'd add that I think you're worrying about the wrong thing. 10M
documents is not very many by modern Solr standards. I rather suspect
that you
I'd add that I think you're worrying about the wrong thing. 10M
documents is not very many by modern Solr standards. I rather suspect
that you won't notice much difference in performance due to how you
construct the query.
Shawn's suggestion to use fq clauses is spot on, though. fq clauses
are re-
On 4/30/2014 2:29 PM, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
> My question is this: what Lucene search syntax will give meback result the
> fastest? If my user is interestedin finding data within “title” and “owner”
> fields only “doc_type” “DOC”, shouldI build my Lucene search syntax as:
>
> 1) skyfall ian
